Definition:  Let’s call a function “locally bounded at x” if there exists a neighborhood of x, N(x;εx) and a number Mx s.t. f(x) ≤ Mx  in the intersection of N(x;εx) with the domain of f.

 

Definition:  We say that f is bounded on a set S if there is a number M s.t. f(x) ≤ M for all x in S.

 

Theorem: If f is locally bounded at each point in I, a closed interval, then f is bounded on I.

 

Before we prove this, please note that this is FALSE for f locally bounded everywhere on  an open interval.  Example?

 

And note that this is false for  an unbounded interval.  Example?

 

Proof:

 

Suppose f is locally bounded on I a closed interval.  Then consider the collection of open intervals:

C = { N(x;εx) | x in I } obtained by applying the definition of locally bounded.  Since each x in I is the center of one of the intervals in C, then C is an “open cover” of I.  But since I is compact, C contains a finite subcover.  Let N1, N2, ... Nk be the finite subset of C . I.e. each Ni is one of the N(x;εx) from C.   And let Mi be the bounds on f(x) in Ni.  Finally let M = max{Mi|i=1,...,k}.  Then since each x is in some Ni  ,  f(x) ≤ Mi ≤ M for all x in I.  QED

 

Comment:  Note that this proof uses the finite subcover very strongly.  Without finiteness we can’t choose an M as a max.